With approval ratings for the current administration at all time record lows, Credo Mobile came up with this near-irresistible e-mail subject line.
The body copy and call-to-action are no less compelling:
Sorry to say, but the political action committee at AT&T contributed the maximum amount allowable by law to the Bush/Cheney campaign — twice. So, go ahead, check out your mobile phone company. And then check out the mobile phone alternative you can trust. It's called CREDO Mobile, and it's mobile phone service that stands up for your values, brought to you by Working Assets.On the other hand, if you're happy with your mobile service just the way it is, accept this photograph as your gift from a real, ahem, Richard.
To get your phone in line with your values, click here.
Just a hunch, but this is going to get Credo onto consumers' radar - fast. Particularly the ones whose major gripe with the telco until now has been its indefensible anti Net neutrality stance.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 3:07 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Hillary may be on her way out, but she still wants your money. I had to chuckle when a message arrived in my inbox this morning, signed by Hillary Clinton, affirming her plans to "extend my congratulations to Senator Obama and my support for his candidacy" Saturday.
The message is what you'd expect. The New York Senator "has been privileged and touched" by the dedication of her campaign volunteers. She'll support Barack Obama's candidacy but she'll "never back down." (Cue the Petty tune.)
Oh, and she can't express her gratitude, so "simply, thank you. "
So far, so good.... But then there's the giant glowing red "Contribute" button at the bottom of the e-mail.

Did I miss something? You're not running anymore but you still want my hard-earned, plummeting-in-value greenbacks?
The button links to her standard online contribution page. I'd imagine the campaign realizes the button is in the e-mail. Still, I have to wonder whether someone unwittingly plugged the e-mail copy into the standard template without recognizing there's a great big "give me yer money" link at the bottom.
Posted by Kate Kaye at 12:28 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
A new study from the E-Mail Experience Council turned up this frightening fact: e-mail from 23 percent of the retailers reviewed was "completely unintelligible" when viewed in an inbox.
The reason? When designing e-mail marketing messages, marketers overlook the fact that images are blocked, by default, for approximately one in two e-mail users. The e-mail council points out that workarounds -- namely the use of HTML text and images -- are not sufficiently being used in e-mail design.
| A Broken Image From My Inbox: |
Need further proof? Here's one message from my inbox, right.
The survey of 472 marketing executives, sponsored by SubscriberMail, also found that 47 percent of the respondents had taken action as a result of image blocking. Those actions include incorporating a "click to view" image link in the upper portion of the e-mail or adding alt tags.
Why results can marketers see if they optimize messages for image blocking? Jeanniey Mullen, executive chairwoman of the Email Experience Council, points out that e-mail marketing current generates an estimated return on investment of $48 for every dollar spent. If messages are optimized, she said estimates show the return could climb to $53 by increasing the open rate, clickthroughs, and conversions.
Posted by Anna Maria Virzi at 7:10 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Comcast had an unfriendly wake-up call this morning. The site was apparently hacked, and the Comcast.net domain taken over. Earlier this morning Comcast e-mail subscribers were greeted with a message saying the site was under construction, coming soon, according to a report on Product-Reviews.
The Internet service provider has e-mail flowing again, but it stresses the importance of changing your password, and making it more complex than the name of your pet. Maybe now, I'll lighten up on the IT here when he nudges me to change my password.
Posted by Enid Burns at 2:52 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Ikea is pulling out all the interactive marketing channel stops to promote the opening of its new Brooklyn store. The campaign -- aimed at getting New Yorkers to the new big box retail location in a seldom-visited area -- utilizes e-mail directing recipients to play a game played both online and via mobile device.
The Ikea Brooklyn Get There Giveaway asks viewers to locate boxes hidden on the pathways leading to the store on a map interface built in Ajax. Find and click on boxes containing designated Ikea products and players are given a code they can send via SMS. Each text message is an additional entry into a shopping giveaway.
The game is clever and somewhat engaging -- but it's not really apparent why mobile would come into play here. There's no apparent rhyme or reason in jumping across channels to actually enter the contest. That said, it doesn't unduly burden users, either, given mobile devices are usually within arms' reach.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 1:44 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Disgusting.
That one single word made Countrywide Financial CEO Angelo Mozilo look like an ogre this week.
It all started when Daniel Bailey Jr. used language from a form letter to ask the lender to revise the terms of his adjustable-rate mortgage so he wouldn't lose his home. Bailey's note went out to about 20 Countrywide addresses, including Mozilo's, according to the latimes.com.
Mozilo took to the keyboard:
"This is unbelievable…Most of these letters now have the same wording. Obviously they are being counseled by some other person or by the Internet. Disgusting," wrote Mozilo, who apparently hit the "reply" button instead of "forward."
Bailey posted Mozilo's note on Loan Safe, bringing widespread attention to the "disgusting" reply.
Countrywide issued a statement to the latimes.com saying the company and Mozilo "regret any misunderstanding caused by his inadvertent response to an e-mail by Mr. Bailey. Countrywide is actively working to help borrowers like Mr. Bailey keep their homes."
Posted by Anna Maria Virzi at 11:27 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
With Mother's Day coming up, a search for "mother" in my personal e-mail inbox turned up these marketing pitches. Some come from the usual suspects, while others aren't so ususal.

Posted by Anna Maria Virzi at 4:07 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Shouldn't marketing be more than just going through the motions?
Over coffee the other day, one of the top e-mail consultants in the country told me about a surprise revelation from a client, one of the major broadband providers in the country.
She's charged with an e-mail retention program aimed at the telco's broadband subscribers. So naturally you'd think that the more subscribers who re-upped their annual contracts, the better the program was performing, right?
Not so fast.
In a recent meeting, the client let drop that subscribers who don't renew their DSL contracts are charged higher monthly fees, and that the majority of lapsed subscribers simply don't notice the rise in costs. "So," my friend incredulously asked her client, "you're telling me that the more this program doesn't work, the more money you make?"
"Well...yes," came the reply.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 11:53 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Retailers promoting Earth Day in their e-mail messages this year increased to 16 percent, up from a measly 4 percent in 2007.
That trend was noted by RetailEmail.Blogspot, which tracks the e-mail marketing campaigns of more than 100 large online retailers.
Tactics varied among retailers. Some such as Banana Republic donated a slice of sales to green charities; others such as OfficeMax promoted energy-efficient products, said Chad White, editor-at-large of the Email Experience Council and founder of RetailEmail.Blogspot.
Other retailers promoted green products in recent weeks, but didn't specifically mention Earth Day. Among them: REI, whose e-mail discussed recycling's merits.
Posted by Anna Maria Virzi at 7:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
![]()
Going green appears to be good for business.
Eastern Mountain Sports entices green-minded customers to open up its e-mail message with the subject line: "Why recycle...just reuse!"
The pitch leads prospects to this colorful line up of water bottles.
Posted by Anna Maria Virzi at 9:35 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Gmail's now allowing you to post-date e-mail messages with a new feature, Custom Time. Cool.
How does it work? "Gmail utilizes an e-flux capacitor to resolve issues of causality," the brainiacs at Google inform us.
Who could pass up customer testimonials like this one?
"I just got two tickets to Radiohead by being the 'first' to respond to a co-worker's 'first-come, first-serve' email. Someone else had already won them, but I told everyone to check their inboxes again. Everyone sort of knows I used Custom Time on this one, but I'm denying it."
April not-so-fooled again.
UPDATE: Google Australia, being on the other side of the globe, is manipulating time in the other direction.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 10:30 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Hey, why build a Web site to hawk your penile enlargement kits or questionable pharmaceuticals? Get with the program - there's a new way to spam. The Google Docs way!
Talk about optimizing landing pages.
We just received a "suggesation for purchaseing Cheap Drugs Online" (sic) in our spam folder. The call-to-action caught our eye - an invitation to click on an unembedded URL clearly leading to a Google Docs page. It's not like we would've ever thought of it ourselves, but spammers wear a special breed of thinking cap.
On the one hand, the spammer behind this scam probably isn't getting great analytics. But spammers aren't interested in crazy notions such as purchase funnels. Only results count. And if this kind of scam results in a much more circuitous route to a whois lookup, so much the better for the spammer.
What will they think of next?
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 2:42 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
While reporting on Yahoo Mail's deliverability issues I spoke to a lot of great sources, including Yahoo. Here's a few spammy tidbits I left out. "Whenever we deploy some tighter, stricter filters, spammers are sometimes the first to complain," said Mark Risher, group product manager for Yahoo Mail. "No one considers himself a spammer; they just consider themselves aggressive e-mail marketers."
Risher closed with a word of advice for e-mail marketers. "Do whatever is in their power to make themselves look like good guys by not using tricks that spammers use, which will in the long run hurt them."
Posted by Enid Burns at 10:50 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Today, the Condé Nast mag sent out this e-mail pitch: "Win a chance to meet the mystery celebrity at Vaseline's Celebrity Reveal Party." The clues: this celebrity's originally from New York [so, it's not Britney] and started her career at the age of 4.
Guess the person's identity, and you'll be entered into a contest to win a trip to New York City, attend a party, and meet the celebrity.
Let's skip the party. How about a bottle of Intensive Rescue Moisture Locking Lotion instead?
Posted by Anna Maria Virzi at 10:25 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Retailers sent out 45 percent more e-mail messages during the six-week holiday season compared to the preceding 12-week period, writes Chad White, the Email Experience Council's editor-at-large. That increase was 3 percentage points higher than 2006.
On average, retailers delivered 2.8 messages a week during the holiday season, from November 10 to December 21.
Harry & David, purveyor of gourmet gift baskets, wins the distinction of having the biggest increase in message frequency out of the 109 retailers examined.
Before the holiday season, Harry & David sent out slightly under one e-mail a week, the council reports. Then, like a sugar high kicking in, the retailer jacked up the frequency eightfold during the holiday season.
Makes one wonder: How many calories per e-mail is that?
Posted by Anna Maria Virzi at 4:04 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Wow. JetBlue scores a perfect 10, both in terms of CRM and as an e-mail marketer.
It was a delightful surprise to receive an e-mail today from the airline containing a $15 voucher against future travel. It's JetBlue's way of apologizing for the in-flight TV system that was inoperative on a flight last week (not that I ever watch it, but still).
Just as impressive is the fact the message is the first I've seen that contains a "View in Handheld" link. Who's more likely, after all, to read e-mail on their handheld devices than frequent air travelers? Better still, the link proved unnecessary. The message rendered perfectly, both on my Blackberry and on my laptop.
Congrats, JetBlue.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 3:34 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Actually, it probably is too late.
With Murdoch dropping hint after hint that his newly-acquired "Wall Street Journal" is likely to become free, why is the marketing department sending these e-mail promotions? This is the second one I've received this week.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 9:42 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
An e-mail confirmation of a booking made on Orbitz just generated a moment of cognitive dissonance.
The first line of the message (and hence the "preview" visible in my online Gmail account) reads:
"Your pop-up blocker is preventing you from viewing this content. Override the program by holding the Control key while clicking the link."
OK, so it's not actually as bad as pop-up ads in e-mail. The message is very obviously generated directly from the purchase confirmation page, which does bear that header because (duh!) pop-ups are pretty much blocked by default in every contemporary browser version.
So why doesn't Orbitz cut out the practice on its site, and thus improve the quality of its e-mail program?
Curiously, while the pop-up message is very prominent in my Web-based Gmail account, it doesn't appear at all in the version that landed in my e-mail client. Strange.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 10:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Internet fraudsters have taken aim at the Federal Trade Commission, an agency that's waged campaigns to help people avoid e-mail scams.
Yesterday, the FTC issued a warning about a bogus e-mail that appears to come from the commission's fraud department.
The e-mail says it's from "frauddep@ftc.gov," and includes an attachment, when downloaded, and links, when clicked on, will unleash a software virus. The subject line, in many instances, read: Complaint update for [name of e-mail recipient] (Case id: #6473) .
The virus, the FTC says, apparently installs a keystroke logger program, which could enable a scammer to obtain an unsuspecting person's passwords and account numbers.
Jackie Dizdul, FTC spokeswoman, today said thousands reported the malicious scam.
It is not the first attack against FTC. "It's somewhat standard, spoofing an institution that people respect, such as a bank, a well-known e-commerce site, the IRS or FTC," Dizdul said.
Government agencies have been taking measures to securegovernment e-mail messages, including one initiative to certify mail.
Some 150 federal agencies certify e-mail using Goodmail, although the FTC isn't a customer, according to David Atlas, Goodmail's senior vice president of worldwide sales. He's quick to point out that certified mail wouldn't have prevented this week's scheme targeting the FTC.
"Anti-phishing, anti-spam, and anti-virus technologies filter out bad mail, and we see the limitations of those filters," he said, thus giving rise to Goodmail's technology that certifies e-mail from a trusted source. In December, Goodmail expects to deliver one billion certified messages, up from 100 million in June
Posted by Anna Maria Virzi at 1:40 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack

This week Habeas released the results to a study on e-mail study on e-mail, in which it found a certain e-mail insecurity factor among Internet users. Don't worry; e-mail is still one of the more relied-upon communication channels, particularly online. However consumers segregate communications among multiple accounts depending on trust factors in an effort to filter spam and other security threats. Habeas plans to present its findings and a detailed report in a Webinar, "Multichannel Revolution, How Web 2.0 and Online Reputation Changes Strategy and Results," on November 13 at 2:00 p.m. EST/11:00 a.m. PST. You can register for the Webinar here.
Posted by Enid Burns at 5:10 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
StrongMail released its Email Marketing Server 4.0 today, which builds on its previous versions. The on-premise solution gives e-mail marketers the flexibility they need to send e-mail without the ESP acting as a gatekeeper, while still having the ESP to monitor and advise on conforming to best practices and monitoring e-mail reputation.
The new product features an intuitive user interface, role-based permissions, advanced data segmentation, targeting and A/B split testing, powerful content management, open connectivity and integration, real-time tracking and reporting, dynamic domain throttling and e-mail authentication, smart bounce processing, support for transactional, and SMS messaging. The SMS messaging is a nice component to reach an opt-in list of recipients on their mobile phones.
Email Marketing Server 4.0 is manageable by all levels of the marketing team, from the junior interactive marketer all the way up to the senior interactive marketer, according to Tricia Robinson-Pridemore, VP of market and product strategy at StrongMail.
Posted by Enid Burns at 5:32 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Message Systems and Return Path partnered to provide Message Systems Delivery Manager users with Return Path Sender Score as an add-on option to improve deliverability rates. The Return Path suite includes sender Score Monitor, Sender Score Reputation Monitor, Sender Score Manager, and Sender Score Certified.
Posted by Enid Burns at 5:10 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
You already know the big e-mail no-nos: words like Viagra, Cialis, Sex, and Free.
E-mail service provider MailChimp has flagged three new words that wreak open-rate and (possibly) deliverability havoc in e-mail subject lines. You've been warned. Use these at your own risk!
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 12:20 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Before you look at deliverability, open rates, and recipient-side metrics on a campaign, it's important to look at how your e-mail campaign is constructed and know it can improve. Blue-chip focused ESP e-Dialog created the Relevance Trajectory to offer its clients a benchmark for e-mail programs. The program looks at factors like segmentation, lifecycle management, triggers, personalization, interactivity, and testing or measurement.
The concept began informally at a client conference held by the company last year mapping where clients fell in the relevance trajectory. The response was positive, and at this past year's conference e-Dialog followed up by asking clients to rate themselves and see how they measured up. Most companies were too hard on themselves, but regardless of score, e-Dialog president and CEO John Rizzi said there is always room for improvement.
Relevance Trajectory can be used as an annual or semi-annual checkpoint, and a strategy toward making sure your e-mail campaigns don't contribute to the inbox clutter, but are meaningful messages for recipients.
While the Relevance Trajectory is seen as an effective benchmark for e-Dialog clients, it only rates the components of an e-mail practice and campaigns, it doesn't have anything to do with the messages once they're sent to recipients. It's the first half of the proposition, and doesn't replace diagnostics on bounce rates and open rates, among other metrics on e-mail senders' minds.
Posted by Enid Burns at 4:25 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Just got through moderating a panel on New Media Platforms at the HBA Expo. BSM Media's Maria Bailey shared some interesting insights about marketing to moms on the Web, much of it based on research she's publishing in a forthcoming book.
According to Maria, fully 30 percent of moms are online between the hours of 8-10 p.m. If your e-mail targets moms, forget blasting at 4 a.m., she implored the crowd. Send between 6-8 (after the kids are tucked into bed) so your message will be at the top of the inbox.
And speaking of e-mail, hope many of you can make it to our own e-mail marketing event in New York on October 2.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 12:56 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
A year following the J.L. Halsey acquisition of ClickTracks, the parent company said it will tightly couple ClickTracks Web analytics data with its e-mail marketing platform Lyris ListManager. Clients will be able to track user behavior across e-mail and their Web site to gain more insight into conversions. Measured activity includes open rates and subsequent visits to the e-mail sender's Web site.
Email senders can learn to better target messages. An example given in a company statement said "An e-mail campaign drives 10,000 visitors to a landing page and only 3 percent convert. A marketer can then analyze the behavior of the 97 percent that didn't convert and target that segment with a follow-up offer."
The next generation of e-mail marketing innovation looks like it will be in more closely integrating online marketing and e-mail, breaking down the silo between the two categories, and sharing ad management and resources across the platforms. A statement from J.L. Halsey said, "This milestone moves the company one step closer to its goal of providing marketers with a platform that integrates the core technologies of e-mail marketing, Web analytics, and Web content management." Expect to see more new products and enhancements to the three core areas on J.L. Halsey's roadmap in the months to come.
Posted by Enid Burns at 11:48 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
A direct ClickZ competitor is behind a new wave of soft core spam. No less than three copies of the top example arrived in rapid succession last week at the unique e-mail address I use to subscribe to their list only. Not only is there zero indication of how the sender obtained the e-mail address in the message, but the content is in no way, shape or form appropriate to a B2B online marketing publication. One that runs e-mail marketing events, no less.
Difficult as is was, I resisted the temptation to blog Episodes 1-3. Then today, another example landed in my inbox -- promising recipients they can meet the "American Curves Featured Model" and avail themselves of an open Champagne bar for "the ladies":
OK, so it's inappropriate content. And renting lists to third-parties (particularly with zero disclosure) is a nasty idea. I decided to check our competitor's privacy policy. Nowhere does it disclose e-mail addresses will be shared or tented to third parties, or so it appears from this very vague, semi-grammatical excerpt:
"We use this individual company information to deliver member only newsletters, and other service-related purposes only your company contact information is made available to other members in the member directory."
It's always a delicate situation to slam a competitor in print. I'm not naming names, but I would caution marketers to be very, very selective when selecting a source for e-mail marketing advice.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 2:14 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
I was a bit surprised this morning to get a newsletter I unsubscribed from recently. Then I scrolled to the end to view the unsubscribe information and read: "To unsubscribe please send an e-mail to xxx_unsub@news.xxx.com. If you have tried to unsubscribe and are still receiving the email, please reply to this message with 'unsubscribe' in the subject line." Is this standard for the publication, or was there a problem? I guess I have to wait and see if attempt number two to unsubscribe will be successful.
Posted by Enid Burns at 10:27 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
What does an early primary season McCain supporter look like? Well, I don't want to resort to using stereotypes, but I guess the "type" or "types" I envision aren't exactly young chicks with trendy bright red hair. Anyway, I was perusing Email Data Source's archive of e-mails recently sent by John McCain 2008, and one sent on June 11 to promote the campaign's fundraising "Call Day" features the image below. Hmmm....

Posted by Kate Kaye at 4:51 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Goodmail, the CertifiedEmail trusted class e-mail provider that raised industry reaction when AOL partnered with it to filter out unwanted messages, announced CertifiedEmail support for Comcast, Cox Communications, Time Warner Cable, and Verizon customers. Each ISP will enable the service's blue ribbon envelope icon to signify mail sent through the system. Goodmail now serves seven ISPs, which the company said represents 60 percent of consumer e-mail users.
Posted by Enid Burns at 2:28 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
I visited with my old pal Bill McCloskey the other day; he runs Email Data Source, a firm that tracks e-mails sent by marketers. He's also been tracking what the political campaigns have been sending out. Well, he stumbled upon an intriguing link in a newsletter sent by FreebieSwamp, a service that sends e-mails filled with links to free stuff online. A recent FreebieSwamp e-mail included -- buried within a virtual quagmire of links to free Reynold's Wrap samples and a free CD from General Tire -- a link to the John Edwards campaign site.

So, my initial reaction was, "Wow, I wonder if the Edwards camp is using affiliate marketing to drive traffic to its campaign merchandise." Well, that's a "no" according to the campaign. A spokesperson told me, "Our campaign had nothing to do with the URL ending up on this list. The newsletter creator must have found the bumper sticker online and added it."
After thinking about it and getting a better sense of FreebieSwamp -- which appears to be a list of free offers put together by a woman named Julie who sells candles on Ebay she promotes thorugh JuliesCandleCottage.com -- I figured that is most likely the way the URL ended up there. But, who knows. I still haven't heard back from Julie or anyone else at FreebieSwamp.
Posted by Kate Kaye at 4:49 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Windows Vista has the ability for content owners and marketers to build desktop widgets to make their platforms more accessible. AOL just released its early version of the AOL Social Mail Gadget at dev.aol.com/mail. The widget gives users one-click, desktop access to e-mail, AIM, photos and video. The top five contacts float to the top so users can immediately message their friends and family.
The widget give AOL desktop visibility to all users. It won't immediately run advertising, but it's not out of the question. "As part of AOL's audience and monetization growth strategy, we are going to look at optimized monetization opportunities surrounding the gadget," said an AOL spokesperson.
Posted by Enid Burns at 4:42 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
At a dinner tonight in Boston, the evening before the Authentication and Online Trust Summit, I had the great privilege of sharing at table with Spamhaus Chief Information Officer Richard Cox.
He shared with me that Hormel, makers of SPAM (the tinned meat product), recently (and graciously) allowed Spamhaus to trademark their name. That's quite a breakthrough for the spam-fighting non-profit, and certainly a first for Hormel. The company awoke one day and found itself the owner of a household name -- for all the wrong reasons.
Richard was a delightful dining companion. He's colorful, articulate, and very amusing. Even if he weren't, it would have been exciting enough to meet a representative of the powerful, UK-based spam fighting organization. Historically, Spamhaus has kept quite a low profile.
"That's about to change," Richard smiled, enigmatically.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 9:27 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Google's asking university students to tell them their thoughts on campus e-mail.
The survey asks students about their e-mail habits and preferences, as well as poses questions about usage of other online applications.
"Since e-mail is such a vital tool for managing academic careers – used to coordinate study groups, organize campus activities, or communicate directly with their professors – this generation of college students includes some of the most knowledgeable consumers of online applications ever," said Jeff Keltner, Google manager of collaboration products for education, in a statement.
Looks like the search giant, which we all know is about to become an online-tool giant (think docs, spreadsheets, calendars, Gmail, etc.) is doing some in-depth research with a tech savvy, early adopter audience.
Hope they share the results.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 12:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Tokyoflash just e-mailed a mighty clever and very seasonal promotion: an invitation to an Easter egg hunt through its Web site.
Five egg icons are hidden on pages throughout the site, the online store for the cult watch brand. Each of the five eggs contains a letter. Once you've located all five, the letters can be rearranged into an Easter-related word, earning the diligent ¥1500 (US$12.65) off their order.
This is a smart promotion. Tokyoflash sells only one thing to a dedicated audience, many of whom collect the models. The goal of this campaign isn't just to get users to click through to the site, but to click through the site. Amazon couldn't get away with it, but a specialty merchant such as this one certainly can.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 10:09 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Yahoo Mail will begin offering unlimited e-mail storage in May. That's way up from the 4MB it offered consumers when its free service launched 10 years ago, and certainly an upgrade from the 1G it proffered in 2005, when all the free online mail services faced the 2G Gmail challenge.
Clearly, the portal is trying to build traffic and loyalty. That's good for consumers, and the advertisers trying to reach them. In reality, though, it's another step towards the new norm. Your Gmail account may say it's limited to 3G now, but fill it up and you're automatically accorded plenty more wiggle room.
E-mail is no longer just about e-mail. It's about your photos, videos and documents residing on the Web, not on a single hard drive or device. The portals want your loyalty. Increasingly, this means they want consumers to entrust them with their lives.
I remember when mine fit on a 5M hard drive. My, how you've grown.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 9:39 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
The City University of New York's (CUNY) Graduate Center often has very good lectures that are open to the public. Buy tickets online and unsurprisingly, you wind up on their e-mail list.
Unfortunately for this non-profit, the mailings that don't wind up in the spam folder often tend to get spiked into the trash, and for no other reason than the 'from' field contains the oblique name "Science & the Arts."
Nary a trace of CUNY, not even in the full address, which comes from PatronMail's equally opaque domain: pmailus.com.
This may fly with CUNY-centric students and faculty members, but the university's goal is to get paying members of the general public into their talks. As a New Yorker, I tend to think of CUNY as CUNY -- there are more than enough science and arts institutions to go around.
Reminds me of a service provider I formerly worked with. His company had a name, but his e-mails all came from "Steve."
That's another instance of too common, too vague, and too spammy-sounding a 'from' field.' Above all, what these 'from' fields realy have in common is they reflect how the senders think about themselves, not about how clients and prospects think about them.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 2:13 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
An e-mail that just arrived from AKQA bore this little graphic in the footer.
It made me stop and think - in a good way. The message is a small but thoughtful one. It generates a warm feeling about the sender and the company.
E-mail is just as green as you want it to be.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 1:20 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
The Authentication and Online Trust Alliance (AOTA) just announced a quarter of Fortune 500 companies now authenticate their e-mail and domains, an important step in combating phishing and other nefarious practices.
In the past 20 months, this group's Sender ID adoption has soared from a mere seven percent to over 25 percent..
E-mail authentication has been the subject of an impressive push from government and trade organizations including the FTC. It's also a requirement for members of the Direct Marketing Association and Email Sender and Provider Coalition, (ESPC). These groups estimate more than 85 percent of all e-mail marketers are now compliant. Authentication is also a best practice reccomended by TRUSTe, the Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group (MAAWG) and Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG).
AOTA's ">Authentication Summit takes place in Boston this year. I'll be speaking -- but mostly listening -- to a great lineup of industry experts as they discuss the very critical issues of online authentication, identity, and reputation.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 12:27 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
There's a unique video campaign for Gmail running on The Wall Street Journal (ClickZ first noticed it yesterday). Introduced by "Kai, one of the engineers behind Gmail," the ads spin a handful of geeky-cute tales that use puppets made from office supplies to convey the e-mail platform's key features. One interesting thing about the WSJ placement is how it's hosted and tracked. While the unit does have some nice rich media features, including the ability to cycle through several ads and scroll through tips, it's fundamentally a YouTube-enabled widget. That means the videos are publicly hosted on YouTube, and can also be shared or embedded elsewhere on the Web. It's ad trafficking made transparent to the user.
Update: Amit Agarwal wrote in to clarify that this is an AdSense unit. Amit's blog, Digital Inspiration, has a screen grab and notes the YouTube player is 250x200 pixels and is embedded in an AdSense unit that's 300x250 pixels.
RSS readers: click through to see the video.
Posted by Zachary Rodgers at 3:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
In a box may be oversimplifying, but is a sense, that's what The E-Mail Marketing Kit is.
ClickZ's e-mail columnist extraordinaire, Jeanne Jennings, has just published this indispensable guide for e-mail marketers. It exhaustively covers every single step of the e-mail process, from developing strategy to getting messages into inboxes and complying with spam legislation.
The fact that the "book" is printed in the format of a tabbed binder makes everything you need to find almost ridiculously easily accessible. In an instant, it guides you through every e-mail related task on the table, from securing budget ("Why e-mail?) to tracking, reporting, list rental, design, and delivery.
The real value-add to this highly informational volume is a template-packed companion CD-ROM that will speed marketers through tedious processes such as creating RFPs, vetting and comparing ESPs, proofing, cost analysis, even templates for both marketing and newsletter e-mail messages.
If you're involved in e-mail marketing, you probably need this book.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 4:39 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
To the list of menaces threatening the lowly inbox we can now apparently add exploding video offers. A new novelty application called BigString Marketer Pro lets marketers send e-mail blasts containing offers that can be programmed to self-destruct at a specified time. The tool attempts to "introduce a sense of urgency and excitement by creating time-sensitive video offers that self destruct,” according to a statement from BigString CEO and President Darin Myman.
Has anyone seen this in action? Do clouds of smoke fill your inbox, blacking out competing offers?
Posted by Zachary Rodgers at 1:13 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Scanning my e-mail includes the compulsory activity of deleting spam on first sight. It's second nature. Which is why when I was scanning the wires a press release with the title "1,600 Per Cent Increase in Revenues Could be Yours" made me go for the delete button. Maybe you've got a service to sell, but the first step the marketing guys at this company should have done was to make the differentiation between the pitch and the multitude of spam. How is this different from the pure junk titled, "Play and make big money.," "Develop your business using our company MHII.OB now" or simply "reputable" I'm about to trash from my e-mail?
Posted by Enid Burns at 12:26 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
The E-mail Experience Council just released results of a report authored by co-founder (and ClickZ columnist) Jeanniey Mullen.
The study examined 1,000 messages, both B2C and B2B. Twenty-one percent of the e-mails appeared completely blank when images were turned off (or stripped) inside a variety of e-mail clients. An additional 28 percent did show at least some relevant copy, but had no working links.
The report concludes over 70 percent of marketers are struggling to get their mailing rendered on the receiving end, and virtually none have begun to grapple with how rendering issues translate to mobile devices.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 9:56 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
ESP EmailLabs says it's time for B2C marketers to through out their old templates and replace them with longer, narrower versions.
The betas of both Yahoo's and Microsoft's online e-mail clients enable the preview pane by default but these spaces are much smaller than what consumers were hitherto used to. Hence, e-mailers are advised to put calls-to-action and other critical information at the top of messages.
“B-to-C marketers who want big results had better start thinking small,” said Stefan Pollard, the company's director of consulting services and ClickZ's e-mail deliverability columnist. “Many are completely unaware that preview panes and automatically blocked images can make their current design templates virtually unreadable. If they were to use a third-party rendering tool to actually test how their e-mails look in consumers’ inboxes, they might be shocked.”
More reasoning is in a press release, but I'm guessing Stefan's going to provide additional insight in his next column.
Posted by Rebecca Lieb at 10:27 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack